
Up there with the Shining as one of my favorite haunted house films of all-time, Poltergeist just doesn’t feel like its 24 years old. The setting, the special effects, the acting…it has all withstood the test of time gracefully. Though I’m afraid I can’t say the same for this film’s despicable sequels (Poltergeist II: the Other Side and Poltergeist III).
The Freeling family lives a rather bland, normal life in the suburbs of Cuesta Verde, California. Everything is going along A-okay until one day, strange things begin to happen. Furniture moves on its own, the house trembles and shakes, and their young daughter, Carol Anne, is seen talking with mysterious people living inside their television set. The haunting soon escalates from harmless to malicious, as the house begins to attack the family with a seemingly murderous intent. In the confusion of one attack, Carol Anne goes missing. Her voice can be heard within the television set and the walls of the home, but her body is nowhere to be found. The Freeling family will have to fight a great, otherwordly evil if they wish to save their daughter.
While most haunted house films before it were more low-key, psychological horror films, relying on spooky noises and maybe the occasional spectral presence, Poltergeist comes in and blows all that out of the water with incredible special effects and tons of action. The effects, provided by Industrial Light and Magic, are glorious in both their beauty and their occasional grotesquery. This movie, produced by Stephen Spielberg and directed by Tobe Hooper, is very much a fusion of the two filmmakers’ styles. It has that warm and fuzzy Spielberg feeling, with lots of soft music and adorable children, but lurking beneath that is Tobe Hooper, who stabs you in the gut when you least expect it with gore, evil clowns and a garden of corpses. It’s sort of a “good cop-bad cop” kind of approach, with Spielberg giving the audience a sense of security just long enough for Tobe Hooper to burst through the door with a chainsaw.
There is lots of terrifying imagery to keep this film well away from the “kid’s movie” status associated with most Spielberg projects. Raw steak mutilating itself, squirming maggots, ghostly demonic beasts, corpses erupting from the ground and, of course, the unforgettable bit where a man peels the flesh off his own face. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. I haven’t even gotten to the killer clown or the man-eating tree, yet. There are so many memorable, frightening moments in this film, it’s hard to keep track of them all.
Now, I suppose the one beef I have with this film is that, well, it’s *not* a poltergeist. Poltergeists are loud, noisy spirits, but are mostly harmless. They certainly don’t transform your bedroom closet into a Sarlaac Pit and try to eat you. There are a few moments early in the film that exhibit truly poltergeist activity, such as the stacking kitchen chairs or the force which can move someone across a floor, harmlessly. Movies like the original “Haunting” are more in tune with what a poltergeist really is.
That little nit-pick aside, Poltergeist is a great haunted house picture. Lots of magnificent special effects that never seem to age, as well as some great acting and creepy atmosphere.
Grade: B+
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
6 Responses for: Poltergeist
1 | The Shining (1980) - Movie Reviews Blog
October 14th, 2006 at 10:59 am[...] “The Shining” narrowly trumps “Poltergeist” as my all time favorite Haunted House picture. It’s a fanastic movie on all levels and should be scene by everyone at least once in their lifetime. It gets a definite A. October 12, 2006 Posted by DrSpengler as Reviews, Suspense, Horror at 12:10 pm [...]
2 | The Amityville Horror: Review - Movie Reviews Blog
October 14th, 2006 at 10:59 am[...] The final act of the film is the textbook example of what NOT to do in any film: do not rip off other movies of the genre. The last act makes a radical departure from the book by trying to fix the mystery of the house in its own way: hey, guess what, it’s actually built over a secret room in which some dude liked to kill people! So we’re treated to 40 minutes of the greatest rip offs of all time, including The Shining, Poltergeist, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle. Originality is thrown out the door in favor of a lame excuse for a plot resolution. The film would have been sufficienty creepy if we were to just assume that it was a house with bad stuff inside and that no one should live there, but no. [...]
3 | - Movie Reviews Blog
October 16th, 2006 at 12:31 pm[...] An often forgotten haunted house picture, though in all honesty, not particularly memorable. It’s a much more “classic” haunted house film, before the likes of Poltergeist came along and introduced boatloads of special effects and adrenaline-pumped action into the genre. The problem with the Changeling is not the script, the direction or the acting, but just that it isn’t very scary. [...]
4 | The Amityville Horror (1979) - Movie Reviews Blog
November 1st, 2006 at 11:24 am[...] Just about every classic haunted house picture has a certain gimmick that helps it achieve its “classic” status. The House on Haunted Hill had Vincent Price, the Haunting had the use of sound, Poltergeist introduced heavy duty special effects, the Shining took a surrealist approach and the Amityville Horror is notable for firstly, being based on a true story, and secondly, for being filmed on-location at the haunted house itself. Granted, there remains much debate over whether the Amityville haunting was real or a hoax, most certainly, most of the contents of Jay Anson’s novel (from which this film was truly based) is nothing but fiction. Still, it’s a note-worthy gimmick which adds to the film’s realism and the sense of dread while the ghostly phenomenon runs its course. [...]
5 | Watership Down (1978) - Movie Reviews Blog
November 1st, 2006 at 12:18 pm[...] Watership Down is rated PG, much in the way that Jaws and Poltergeist are rated PG…debatably. It’s very violent and sometimes very scary, though the story and animation is strong and timeless. I’d recommend this to an older children’s audience. It’s certainly not for 5 year-olds, anyhow. There was a newer adaptation produced in 1999 which tones down the violence and mature themes, but at the same time, robs the film of its heart and depth. I’d avoid it if I were you. The original Watership Down, however, gets a solid A. November 1, 2006 Posted by DrSpengler as Reviews, Suspense, Kids/Family, Drama, Animation at 12:18 pm [...]
6 | The Mangler - Movie Reviews Blog
November 30th, 2006 at 2:00 pm[...] Three legends of the horror industry come together: Tobe Hooper (the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Poltergeist), Robert Englund (a Nightmare on Elm Street) and Stephen King (Creepshow, It). So, does this combination result in success? No. No it does not. [...]
Leave a reply