
Note: This review is based on the 2000 cut of the film more commonly referred to as “The Version You’ve Never Seen Before”.
The Exorcist is a horror film from a time when movie-makers expected a little more patience from their audience. Back then, you had to pay attention through torturous minutes of boring sequences, such as that dreadful concept known as “character development”, with nary an explosion in sight. Yet those willing to subject themselves to an hour’s worth of story progression, plot set-up and tension-building are rewarded with a stellar second half which almost feels like a completely different film.
After an archeological dig out in the Middle East, Father Merrin (Max Von Sydow) discovers the Devil has come to Earth. Back in Washington DC, a young girl named Regan (Linda Blair) is acting rather strangely, spending large amounts of time with her imaginary friend, Captain Howdy, and developing a very volatile temper. Her condition worsens rapidly and soon Regan, claiming to be the embodiment of the Devil, becomes a danger to herself and others. Regan’s Mother turns to Father Karras (Jason Miller), a Catholic priest who has been questioning his own faith, to exorcise her daughter. Father Karras and Father Merrin work together to try and drive the evil force from Regan, but the Devil won’t leave without a fight.
Possibly the one complaint I hear most frequently about this film is “It’s boring”. I suppose it all depends on your attention span, but I’d sooner classify the film as “slow”, and that’s only in regards to the first half. Today’s audience, at least the younger set, have a rough time sitting through movies that don’t have at least one explosion every 10 minutes followed by bullet-time effects and catchy one-liners, so they watch movies like “Exorcist: the Beginning”, instead. The original Exorcist just doesn’t stand a chance with the hordes of Paul Anderson and Uwe Boll-fanatics out there. I will admit, though, that this movie starts off very sluggishly, and when I was a kid, (elementary school) I didn’t make it all the way through the first time I rented the movie (or, that is, the first time my Mom rented it for me). Never-the-less, for those of you without ADD that manage to suffer through the film’s “boring” half, you’re treated to a very intense and frightening look at demonic possession.
Regan’s possession is what people remember best about the film (obviously), and rightfully so, as it is extremely memorable for how sick and disturbing it can be. Seeing a 10 year old girl masturbating with a cross until she’s a bloody mess, telling a priest what his Mother is doing in Hell or spinning her head around in circles and puking up green slime…it’s not the sort of thing you’re soon to forget.
The special effects range from minimalist to “in your face” and they all work perfectly. To achieve the icy breath of Regan’s freezing-cold bedroom, they actually hooked refrigeration units up to the room to lower the temperature. The “spider-walk” scene was done by a gymnast dressed to look like Regan and the way she contorts her body is very unearthly. And, of course, there’s the spinning head and the green puke.
Despite being “boring” by some people’s standards, the Exorcist is a fantastic film with lots of disturbing imagery and a very strong finish. I give it an A. Also, if you’re ever in DC for any reason, I recommend you visit the infamous staircase. It’s just as creepy in real life as it is in the film.
Grade: A
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
5 Responses for: The Exorcist (1973)
1 | A Nightmare on Elm Street - Movie Reviews Blog
October 5th, 2006 at 4:45 pm[…] When most people think of Freddy Krueger, they think of the stand-up comedian version who makes more bad puns than kills. However, you’ll find little of that in the original installment of the franchise. The first Nightmare on Elm Street film isn’t a campy, silly slasher horror-comedy like the majority of the sequels. Actually, the first film is a legitimately good horror film with a strong story, unique scares and impressive actors. I’d rank it as highly as I would movies like the Exorcist or the Shining. […]
2 | Just Like Heaven: Review - Movie Reviews Blog
October 11th, 2006 at 3:39 pm[…] The movie does have its moments of objective comedy, such as a few jabs at classic “ghost” movies such as The Exorcist and Ghostbusters. And then there’s Jon Heder in the only memorable role of Darryl, the stoned psychic who acts like a tripped out Shaggy from Scooby Doo. The plot is tediously clichéd until a certain point where it becomes contemporarily ironic, pointing out a rhetorical pro-life situation that becomes the crux of the film. I really enjoyed that part, but liberals will probably react to it with protests and chaining themselves to trees or whatever. […]
3 | dominique
October 28th, 2006 at 12:50 pmI was told that the original version showed in the theater in the US and Canada was 4 hours long. It was pulled out of theater 1 week latter and cut to the version of 1973. If that is threw, the original version released in theater must exist. I would like to know.
Thanks
4 | Bug (2007) - Review - Movie Reviews Blog
May 26th, 2007 at 8:56 pm[…] honestly haven’t seen a lot of William Friedkin’s movies. As a matter of fact, outside of “the Exorcist”, I don’t think I’ve seen any of his other movies. Despite that, fond memories of “the […]
5 | Exorcist
July 27th, 2007 at 9:07 am“Something beyond comprehension is happening to a little girl on this street, in this house. A man has been called for as a last resort to try and save her. That man is The Exorcist.” This tagline from the 1973 movie is unforgettable. Though the movie may look silly or boring now, back when it was released, it generated fear in the audience like no other film had before it.
Leave a reply