
I have three favorite sub-genres when it comes to horror films: Slasher, Zombie and Haunted House. In regards to the Haunted House films, “the Shining” from 1980 ranks at the very top. An eerie, unnerving tale that could only be realized to its full potential by the master of the surreal, Stanley Kubrick.
Struggling author, Jack Torrence (Jack Nicholson), has been hired to be the winter caretaker of the Overlook Hotel, secluded far away in the mountains. Jack, his wife (Shelly Duvall) and their son, Danny (Danny Lloyd), get accustomed to the cavernous hotel as the staff gradually leaves for the winter. All save for Dick Hollaran (Scatman Crothers), who sticks around long enough to have a few words with Danny. Danny has a bizarre gift: the ability to read other’s thoughts and see visions of the future. Mr. Hollaran has that ability, called the shining, as well, and warns Danny to be careful. The Overlook Hotel has a bad history and can cause men to go out of their mind. Soon, the Torrences are left all alone in the Hotel, confined within the premesis by a frigid snowstorm. As the weeks progress, the Hotel begins to “speak” with Jack, chipping away at his sanity. Jack is about to snap, and that means trouble for his family.
The Shining isn’t just a scary film, it’s downright creepy from start to finish. Even when nothing is going on, the scenery, the music, the lighting…everything comes together to deliver a very uncomfortable feeling to the audience. Stanley Kubrick directed many stellar films in his career, but out of them all, the Shining is easily my favorite.
Stephen King didn’t like it so much, though. It takes numerous liberties with the source material (King’s novel), and as a result, offended King to the point of demanding his name be removed from the credits. A stricter adaptation was later made as a TV miniseries in 1997, but despite being more accurate to the book, it was downright terrible.
The shining uses special effects sparingly, and instead, relies on a fantastic performance from Jack Nicholson to really convey a sense of dread and terror. Jack Nicholson has always been a pretty scary-looking guy, but he’s just a monster in this film. While his performance is magnificent, there is one problem I did have. From the beginning, even before they reach the hotel, you sorta get the feeling that Jack is a little nuts and quick to anger, as opposed to a normal Dad driven over the edge of sanity. While Jack’s gradual transformation into an axe-wielding lunatic was still excellent, you get the impression he had already started down that path long before the first scene in the movie.
The more visually stimulating horror effects are about as memorable as Jack Nicholson’s performance. The elevator spilling over with blood, the old hag in the bathroom, the cobwebbed room full of corpses, and, of course, the most frightening moment of them all, the scene with the furries. Brrrrr! All of these moments are delightfully frightening and not soon to be forgotten.
“The Shining” narrowly trumps “Poltergeist” as my all time favorite Haunted House picture. It’s a fanastic movie on all levels and should be scene by everyone at least once in their lifetime.
Grade: A
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
7 Responses for: The Shining (1980)
1 | A Nightmare on Elm Street - Movie Reviews Blog
October 12th, 2006 at 12:32 pm[…] When most people think of Freddy Krueger, they think of the stand-up comedian version who makes more bad puns than kills. However, you’ll find little of that in the original installment of the franchise. The first Nightmare on Elm Street film isn’t a campy, silly slasher horror-comedy like the majority of the sequels. Actually, the first film is a legitimately good horror film with a strong story, unique scares and impressive actors. I’d rank it as highly as I would movies like the Exorcist or the Shining. […]
2 | The Amityville Horror: Review - Movie Reviews Blog
October 12th, 2006 at 12:34 pm[…] The final act of the film is the textbook example of what NOT to do in any film: do not rip off other movies of the genre. The last act makes a radical departure from the book by trying to fix the mystery of the house in its own way: hey, guess what, it’s actually built over a secret room in which some dude liked to kill people! So we’re treated to 40 minutes of the greatest rip offs of all time, including The Shining, Poltergeist, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle. Originality is thrown out the door in favor of a lame excuse for a plot resolution. The film would have been sufficienty creepy if we were to just assume that it was a house with bad stuff inside and that no one should live there, but no. […]
3 | Poltergeist - Movie Reviews Blog
October 14th, 2006 at 10:57 am[…] Up there with the Shining as one of my favorite haunted house films of all-time, Poltergeist just doesn’t feel like its 24 years old. The setting, the special effects, the acting…it has all withstood the test of time gracefully. Though I’m afraid I can’t say the same for this film’s despicable sequels (Poltergeist II: the Other Side and Poltergeist III). […]
4 | Twilight Zone: the Movie - Movie Reviews Blog
October 24th, 2006 at 12:39 pm[…] The second segment (directed by Stephen Spielberg) is my least favorite of the bunch, which hurts me to say it, as I love Scatman Crothers (“the Shining”). A remake of “Kick the Can”, a kind-hearted old man (Crothers) visits a retirement home where all the old folks are wasting away their final years. The new-comer encourages them to reclaim the magic of their youth with a game of kick-the-can, though some of the more bitter old timers aren’t very fond of the idea. […]
5 | The Amityville Horror (1979) - Movie Reviews Blog
November 1st, 2006 at 11:25 am[…] Just about every classic haunted house picture has a certain gimmick that helps it achieve its “classic” status. The House on Haunted Hill had Vincent Price, the Haunting had the use of sound, Poltergeist introduced heavy duty special effects, the Shining took a surrealist approach and the Amityville Horror is notable for firstly, being based on a true story, and secondly, for being filmed on-location at the haunted house itself. Granted, there remains much debate over whether the Amityville haunting was real or a hoax, most certainly, most of the contents of Jay Anson’s novel (from which this film was truly based) is nothing but fiction. Still, it’s a note-worthy gimmick which adds to the film’s realism and the sense of dread while the ghostly phenomenon runs its course. […]
6 | The Messengers (2007) - Movie Reviews Blog
February 3rd, 2007 at 4:55 pm[…] twist ending is especially random and hard to stomach, as it leaves you wishing you were watching “The Shining”, “The Amityville Horror”, “What Lies Beneath” or any other of the dozens of movies that […]
7 | 1408 - Review - Movie Reviews Blog
June 22nd, 2007 at 11:43 pm[…] with other haunted house stories written by King, with more than a passing resemblance to “The Shining” and “Rose Red”. Like the aforementioned examples, “1408” is a more surreal take on the […]
Leave a reply